Telemedicine in the Emergency Department
SUMMARY:
Increased emergency department (ED) demand, staff shortages and hospital consolidations have led to overcrowded ED’s.
Virtual ED care, is a proposed alternative service model to potentially alleviate ED overcrowding.
There are a number of potential benefits to virtual ED services, but various challenges as well.
REVIEW
ED’s are typically crowded with post pandemic number of visits exceeding pre-pandemic numbers.
In 2021 there were approximately 139.8 million ED visits vs 130 million in 2018.
Over 27% of ED visits have been proposed able to be managed in alternative settings.
Tele-ED service models are typically decentralized, with a remote emergency physician functioning as a specialist on call.
Published studies typically have all patients initial triaged by the virtual ED.
Collected health data and evaluations to determine the level of care required by the patient are then determined for optimum outcomes.
Proposed benefits of Tele-ED include:
Improved quality of care
Decreased patient transfer rates from rural to major centers
Reduced mortality rates
Reduced first contact and treatment
Cost reduction
Identified Challenges include:
Technical issues and difficulties
Regulatory issues
Security (patient confidentiality)
Limited literature on technology implementation
Weak study designs of most studies limit a conclusive confirmation of benefits.
A summary of 2 Australian studies (19,026 patients) initially seen via virtual ED or Urgent Care demonstrates:
3,566 (18.7%) were referred to the ED
856 (24.0%) of referred patients did not go to the ED
375 (13.8%) of patients were admitted to the hospital after ED referral
328 (2.1%) of patients not referred to the ED were admitted to the hospital
Tele-ED services have been reported to produce a cost savings of $1,832 per person after accounting for total operational and ambulance savings.
This is an estimated ROI ratio of 1.12
CONCLUSIONS:
There is both favorable and controversial evidence on the use of telemedicine within the emergency department.
An estimated 27% of ED visits may be better managed in alternative settings.
Conversely, only a very small percentage of patients (2.1%) were admitted to the hospital after a tele-ED visit where referral to the hospital not occur.
Further clinical validations are needed.